Wallet Logo and Token List Inclusion for Crypto Projects

What does wallet logo and token list inclusion cover?

Wallet inclusion work prepares a project’s token information and logo for relevant wallet-facing discovery and verification workflows. It is useful when a token is hard to identify in a wallet, its logo is missing or inconsistent, or the team wants a structured route for Trust Wallet assets and Jupiter verification.

Wallet visibility is not one universal listing. A wallet may draw token information from different sources, apply its own review, or display assets differently across search, token details, and swap interfaces. We first identify the specific outcome you need, then separate work that can be submitted from updates that depend on the wallet or its data providers.

A project should be ready to provide:

• The correct chain and token contract address.
• A logo file that meets the requested format and presentation requirements.
• Official website and social links that agree with the project identity.
• Clear token name, symbol, and supporting public information.
• A contact who can confirm details or respond to review feedback.

We check for inconsistencies before preparing the submission. Where a listing or verification workflow requires a public source of truth, we help align the project’s own materials and records. For wider listing needs, see listings and verification or explorer token information and logo updates.

How do Trust Wallet assets and Jupiter verification differ?

Trust Wallet asset visibility and Jupiter verification are separate workflows, so a project should define which wallet experience it wants to address before preparing a submission. A token logo appearing in one interface does not itself establish that the asset has passed another platform’s review or will appear in every wallet view.

For Trust Wallet-related work, we organise the token identity details and logo materials for the relevant asset workflow, then coordinate submission and follow-up. For Jupiter, we prepare the information required for the applicable verification route and help the team keep its public project identity consistent. The exact material requested can change, so we confirm the current official guidance before finalising a package. Review Trust Wallet and Jupiter for platform information.

Before choosing a route, ask:

• Is the main issue token identification, logo display, or verification status?
• Does the token contract and chain information match across official channels?
• Are website, social accounts, and token metadata maintained by the project?
• Is the project seeking a wallet display update, a verification review, or both?

If your priority is verification status rather than wallet display, CoinMarketCap community verification and circulating supply verification are distinct services with their own evidence requirements. We scope them separately rather than treating one approval as transferable to another platform.

What will the project receive from the wallet submission?

The project receives an organised asset pack, a submission record, and a clear view of the work completed. The scope is agreed before work starts, so the team knows whether it covers Trust Wallet materials, Jupiter verification preparation, or both.

Depending on the agreed route, deliverables can include:

• A review of token identity details and public project links.
• Logo and metadata checks for consistency and readiness.
• A list of missing or conflicting information to resolve before submission.
• Preparation and coordination of the agreed platform submission.
• Follow-up on requests for clarification, with actions assigned to the project or our team.
• A concise status report and handover of submitted materials.

We also flag issues that can obstruct a clean review, such as different token symbols across project channels, outdated links, unclear contract references, or logo files that do not match the project’s current identity. Fixing these before submission is more useful than sending a complete-looking package with contradictory details.

Wallet work can sit alongside other listing tasks, but each destination needs its own plan. If you are updating contract information or a brand identity, consider contract migration and rebranding updates. If the immediate need is a tracker profile rather than wallet visibility, review DEXTools and DEXScreener profile updates.

How do we prepare and coordinate a wallet listing?

The process begins with a scope review, then moves from information checks to submission and follow-up. This sequence helps founders resolve avoidable inconsistencies before an external review begins.

We start by confirming the token, chain, intended wallet experience, and current visibility issue. Next, we collect the logo, contract reference, official project links, and any previous platform correspondence. We compare those details and give the project a focused checklist of missing or conflicting items. Once the team approves the final information, we prepare the submission materials and coordinate the agreed workflow.

After submission, we track platform correspondence and communicate any requests that need a project decision or additional evidence. The overall timing is shaped by how quickly the project supplies accurate information and how the platform handles its review. We provide status updates rather than suggesting that an external review will finish on a particular date.

To keep the work moving, appoint one project contact who can confirm token details and approve public links. Keep source files and final versions in one shared location, and tell us promptly if a contract, logo, website, or brand name changes during the process. For a broader overview of our delivery approach, visit how we work. The starting price is from $990 / project; the final scope is confirmed against the wallet workflow and preparation required.

What can the wallet platform decide independently?

Wallet teams and their data sources control acceptance, verification status, display placement, and the timing of any update. Our commitment is to the agreed preparation, submission, coordination, and reporting—not to a platform decision or a particular position in wallet search.

A complete submission can still be reviewed under platform-specific criteria, returned for clarification, or left unchanged if the platform does not accept the request. A logo may also become visible in one wallet view before another because interfaces can rely on different sources or refresh on different schedules. Those decisions are outside our control, and no service can promise a specific Trust Wallet or Jupiter outcome in advance.

The practical way to manage this uncertainty is to keep the request narrow and evidence-led. Confirm the contract address against the project’s official channels, use a logo that represents the current brand, and ensure the project can substantiate its token details. If reviewers ask for revisions, respond with consistent information rather than submitting conflicting variants.

We will distinguish completed agency work from pending platform review in updates, and we will explain what action remains with the project. If the request is not ready for submission, we will identify the gap before proceeding. For a separate platform profile issue, listing profile remediation can help address inconsistent or outdated listing information.

Prices

Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.

How it works

1. Define the wallet outcomeWe confirm whether the project needs logo visibility, a token list workflow, Jupiter verification preparation, or a scoped combination.
2. Collect and check project materialsThe team provides token details, logo files, official links, and relevant correspondence. We identify missing or inconsistent information.
3. Approve the submission packWe prepare the agreed materials and ask the project contact to confirm the public identity details before submission.
4. Coordinate submission and follow-upWe handle the agreed coordination, track replies, and flag any request that needs evidence or a decision from the project.
5. Report status and hand overThe project receives a summary of submitted work, current status, and any outstanding actions.